Frequently Asked Questions:

Q. Who are you?
A. Corey Whitworth.  Lovecraft fan and avid movie watcher.  I  have several hobbies, most of which wouldn't interest you in the least.

Q. What's up with this site?
A. Well...I established it to showcase movies and other media that has been inspired by horror author HP Lovecraft.  I've tried to compile the most comprehensive collection of Lovecraft cinema.

Q. Where did you find all these movies?  What are the criteria to be included?
A. Some I just happened upon in the local video rental stores, some I found at mall video stores, a few are available online and some I caught on tv.  The criteria needed is to either be inspired by Lovecraft's stories/creations (such as The Dunwich Horror or Re-Animator) or to have a theme similar to one of Lovecraft's (such as The Thing or The Stuff).  Also, borrowing names or creatures from Lovecraft's Cthulhu Mythos also can be considered.

Q. Who decides what ratings they get?  Why'd you totally trash some, and praise others?
A.  I decided the ratings based off of just how entertaining I found the film...the ones I trashed mostly deserved it.  If it really doesn't get a point across, make you feel some kind of emotion (even repulsion is an emotion in my book) or tell a good story...then its not going to score very high in my book.

Q. What's your favorite Lovecraftian movie?  The Worst?
A.  Wow...that's tough.  As for the best, I'll keep it as a tie between The Resurrected and Cast A Deadly Spell.  Both those films just really tried hard to be faithful to a concept and idea, as well as not taking the low road that most horror movies tread.  Plus, when you can succesfully pull off a pulp/horror/comedy with an original storyline...it's gonna get thumbs up from me. 
   As for the worst...geez, I'd have to say Cthulhu Mansion.  Man, that one just stumped me.  Although the credits say "inspired by HP Lovecraft" and the title bears the name Cthulhu...it had NOTHING to do with Lovecraft.  The dialogue was a mix of common street explitives and uninteresting commentary.  I was ashamed to have purchased this film.

Q. Can I use some of the graphics/sounds/videos on your site?
A. Here's my two cents on that subject:  I can't stop you from "borrowing" anything on this site.  Anyone who can point and click can download all the material from this site to a computer.  However, I do frown upon people using the material for their sites.  I not only put several months into this new site, but 3 years overall on some of the reviews and graphics.  If you end up using any of the material I have provided, please email me and at least have the decency to let me know, and please link to this site as the original provider.  

Q. Well...who said you could post any of this material??
A. All the multimedia such as still images, video captures and sound captures are done under compliance with the Fair Use Law.

Q.  So how much money do you make from the site?
A. Nothin', zip, zilch, nada, absolutely not one dime.  It's not-for-profit, just for the love of the genre.  If anything, I'm paying out the wazoo to pay for this website's server.  I provide everything here as a service.  To enlighten and inform the viewer on the subject of Lovecraftian multimedia. 

Q. So how did you make the site?  All the graphics and videos?
A. I am running Win98 with a P3 450 with 128 MB RAM, 8 MB Nvidia TNT video card, Soundblaster 128 Platinum sound card, Hauppauge WinTV video capture card, 20.5 GB Hard Drive, 6x DVD Rom Drive, Lynxsys 10/100 Network Card connected to a Toshiba Cable Modem and a NEC 17" monitor.  I do all the video encoding using Real Networks Real Producer Pro and Windows Media Encoder and all my graphics are created using Adobe Photoshop 5.1.   All the videos were played on my trusty Magnavox 4 head VCR, and dvds were played on my fantastic Toshiba 2109.


"Fair Use Law"
PER TITLE 17 - UNITED STATES CODE - SECTION 107 
"Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - 1 the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2 the nature of the copyrighted work; 3 the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4 the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors."